Fostering Psychological Safety at Work
- ORC Institute

- Jul 21, 2025
- 5 min read

In today’s fast-paced and ever-evolving work environments, psychological safety has emerged as a cornerstone of high-performing, innovative, and resilient organizations. Coined by Amy Edmondson (1999), psychological safety refers to the shared belief that a team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking—that employees can voice concerns, admit mistakes, and offer new ideas without fear of embarrassment or retribution. This sense of security is not just a “nice to have”—it’s a prerequisite for collaboration, learning, and continuous improvement.
While the concept of psychological safety is gaining traction in leadership and HR circles, translating it into daily work culture remains a challenge. Here is where employee surveys—when designed and implemented effectively—can play a powerful role. More than tools for gathering opinions, scientifically grounded surveys can identify barriers to safety, illuminate hidden dynamics, and provide actionable pathways for creating inclusive and empowering work environments.

Understanding Psychological Safety
Psychological safety is the invisible foundation on which trust, creativity, and collaboration are built. According to Edmondson (1999), it is the belief that one can speak up, ask questions, admit errors, or challenge the status quo without being punished or humiliated. It is not about being “nice” or avoiding conflict—it’s about creating the conditions for honest dialogue, constructive dissent, and shared learning.
Research shows that teams with high psychological safety:
Are more likely to engage in learning behaviors such as asking for feedback and experimenting with new approaches (Edmondson, 2004).
Report higher engagement and job satisfaction (Frazier et al., 2017).
Show better performance, particularly in knowledge-intensive and rapidly changing industries (Newman et al., 2017).
Psychological safety is particularly vital in diverse teams, where varying perspectives, identities, and experiences come together. Without a safe climate, underrepresented voices may remain unheard, creativity can stagnate, and burnout may rise due to emotional suppression and social anxiety.
Despite its clear benefits, psychological safety can be fragile—easily undermined by hierarchy, micromanagement, or unacknowledged bias. That’s why organizations must be intentional in measuring and nurturing it.

How Employee Surveys Support Psychological Safety
Employee surveys are more than tools for organizational diagnostics—they are catalysts for culture change. When thoughtfully designed and genuinely acted upon, surveys can directly foster psychological safety by making employees feel heard, respected, and valued.
This is how employee surveys contribute to psychological safety:
1. Signal That Employee Voices Matter
Conducting regular employee surveys sends a powerful message: Your experience counts. This acknowledgment is foundational to psychological safety, especially when employees see that their input is taken seriously and leads to visible improvements. According to Frazier et al. (2017), when employees perceive their organization as responsive to their feedback, their trust in leadership increases, which in turn enhances their willingness to speak up.
2. Provide a Safe Outlet for Honest Feedback
Surveys—especially when anonymous—create a low-risk channel for employees to express concerns, share ideas, or raise difficult topics they may not feel comfortable addressing in person. This is particularly important for employees who may fear retribution, face identity-based marginalization, or are newer to the organization.
3. Identify Psychological Barriers to Openness
Well-structured survey items can assess psychological safety directly. For example, the question “It is safe to take a risk on this team” (Edmondson, 1999) reveals whether employees feel comfortable taking interpersonal risks. Survey responses help HR and leadership teams detect problem areas—be it at the team, department, or leadership level—so they can address them proactively.
4. Track Progress and Sustain Accountability
Measuring psychological safety over time allows organizations to track cultural shifts and hold leaders accountable for fostering inclusive climates. According to Newman et al. (2017), interventions aimed at improving psychological safety are most effective when paired with ongoing measurement and open feedback loops.
5. Encourage Constructive Dialogue
When survey results are shared transparently and followed up with facilitated team discussions, they create opportunities for joint reflection and collective problem-solving. This reinforces the message that speaking up is valued, and that feedback leads to action—not retaliation or indifference.

Strategies for Integrating Surveys into Psychological Safety Initiatives
To fully leverage employee surveys as a driver of psychological safety, organizations must go beyond one-time measurements. Instead, they should embed surveys within a broader cultural strategy that prioritizes openness, learning, and continuous improvement. Below are key practices:
1. Design Surveys with Psychological Safety in Mind
Use scientifically validated items to assess psychological safety—such as those based on Edmondson’s (1999) framework—and avoid vague or overly broad questions. Include items that tap into trust, inclusiveness, openness, and team dynamics.
2. Ensure Anonymity and Confidentiality
Employees must trust that their responses are private. Clearly communicate how data will be handled and who will see the results. This encourages candor, especially when surfacing sensitive or critical feedback.
3. Translate Data into Action
One of the biggest threats to psychological safety is inaction. If surveys are conducted but nothing changes, employees may become disengaged or even more hesitant to share concerns in the future. Create clear processes for interpreting results, involving teams in solution-building, and following up transparently.
4. Train Leaders in Active Listening and Response
Equip managers with skills to respond constructively to feedback, including how to lead debrief sessions after survey results are shared. Leaders should avoid defensiveness and demonstrate curiosity and appreciation for employee honesty.
5. Embed Surveys in a Continuous Feedback Culture
Rather than relying solely on annual surveys, use pulse surveys or real-time feedback tools that make listening an ongoing process. This shows commitment and creates agility in responding to shifting team dynamics.
6. Close the Feedback Loop
Always communicate what was learned from the survey and what actions will be taken. Even if no immediate change is possible, acknowledging the feedback and explaining constraints helps maintain trust and reinforces psychological safety.
Conclusion
Psychological safety is not a buzzword—it's a foundational condition for thriving teams and innovative organizations. When employees feel safe to express ideas, ask questions, or admit mistakes, they’re more likely to collaborate, grow, and stay engaged. But psychological safety doesn’t emerge by accident—it must be cultivated intentionally.
Employee surveys, when deployed thoughtfully and acted upon consistently, are among the most effective tools to build and sustain this safety. They help detect barriers to openness, empower employees to speak up, and hold organizations accountable to their values. At ORC, we support organizations in designing survey systems that not only measure psychological safety but actively build it—laying the groundwork for trust, resilience, and shared success.
References
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.11.003
Liang, L. H., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
Google re:Work. (2015). The five keys to a successful Google team. https://rework.withgoogle.com/print/guides/5721312655835136/




Comments